re: Davin's correct, you know.
Okay, had I posted the piece without the inflammatory addendum, what do YOU think the response would have been?
However pissy Davin gets about it, he wrote one of the two wisecracks already on this thread about the fact that the article is in the Weekly Standard, without commenting on the content.
Just out of sheer curiosity, did you read the piece? What did you think? Only two people have actually commented on the content yet.
And my comments about the threshold of credibility being remarkably flexible on these issues and others stands.