I will read the paper, but the original a couple of years ago was so full of holes that it would take pages to fill them....I think the original was in 'nature' or 'science'- all it took was an experience in experimental method to wonder about the sanity of the original group- main thing I remember about the paper was thinking "My god! I can think of 3 conclusive tests that I would do before I published this, and they did none of them!" and I am not a nuclear physicist! An expert could find even more faults....

I HOPE it works out because it would be a real new discovery... As I said above, I will read the paper and then decide.... I just hope it isnt as embarrassing as the first paper...It will never be a power source...