Now let's focus, Tom. It's NOT about Clinton.

Current Events » in reply to re: Back to basics.

Bowser — 3/9/2004 5:53:36 AM (archived)

I'm beginning to understand Fox. Try to focus, stay with the subject. This isn't a "everybody else is worse" matter.

This is about 9-11, a tragedy that GWB quite possibly could have prevented. He doesn't want you and I to know if he could have, so it's a safe guess he could.

And he wants to make political profit from the deaths of innocent Americans. And some of their families don't like to have their loved ones used like that.

It is NOT about Clinton (GWB is President, that seems to be hard for some people to remember) and it's not about Kerry.

It IS about WTC, 9-11, and the anguish of innocent families and relatives being callously used for political profit.

By GWB.

Arf (Repeat after me. "George Walker Bush is President, Bill Clinton is a FORMER President.)

The whole thread (24 posts)

A slightly different opinion from those who lost people on 9/11 - Tom Brosz - 3/8/2004 8:25:43 PM
- The liberals don't give a flip about the 911 families or decency. It is all about controlling what we discuss in the election - ebnelson - 3/9/2004 4:23:57 AM
- Back to basics. Remedial Decency 10. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 1:11:37 AM
  - If you liked that ad, boy have we got a great follow-up! - RNC staffer - 3/9/2004 4:54:52 AM
  - re: Back to basics. - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 2:45:08 AM
    - Now let's focus, Tom. It's NOT about Clinton. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 5:53:36 AM
      - Am I going too fast for you? - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 7:42:25 AM
        
        You're post raises even more questions. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 2:13:02 PM
        
        More on this - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 7:37:57 PM
        
        re: more questions. - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 5:59:36 PM
        
        Making political profit from dancing on the graves - - - - Bowser - 3/9/2004 6:19:57 PM
        
        Man overboard. - RobVG - 3/9/2004 6:47:53 PM
        
        And you call it what? (n/t) - Bowser - 3/9/2004 8:55:56 PM
        
        Right down the 3rd base line. Fair- not foul. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/9/2004 9:18:10 PM
        
        Could be a 3 bagger if the fielder loses it in his mutt. (n/t) - gbaikie - 3/10/2004 4:36:56 AM
        
        You want to think again on that? - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 6:43:47 PM
        
        You don't want to know if it could have been prevented? - Bowser - 3/9/2004 9:04:31 PM
        
        Dodge and weave - Tom Brosz - 3/10/2004 12:17:32 AM
        
        You must know RobVG. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/10/2004 12:31:34 AM
        
        You're chasing your own tail again. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/9/2004 9:42:57 PM
        
        I beginning to think you disagree. Crossing my mind, anyway. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/9/2004 10:07:00 PM
        
        I disagree - RobVG - 3/9/2004 10:48:44 PM
        
        I thought so. You must know Tom B. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/10/2004 4:39:42 AM
- A small note on media tilt - Tom Brosz - 3/8/2004 8:29:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (24 posts)