You don't want to know if it could have been prevented?

Current Events » in reply to You want to think again on that?

Bowser — 3/9/2004 9:04:31 PM (archived)

You're happy with your head in the sand? You're happy knowing that your government doesn't want you to know they could have prevented this atrocity?

Why?

As far as losing this one, I can't lose it. Impossible.

There are people who will disagree, who believe that it's reasonable to trade upon these things for political advantage. Who don't care to understand others sensitivities. Who will demonize anyone who disagrees with them.

"Your husband died, and you really don't want the site of his death shoved in your face every time you turn on the TV for the next 8 months?

Well, are you a Democrat?"

I'll accept that some people exhibit that level of insensitivity. And if there were a lynch mob of them, 10,000 all a'howling, all validating each other, and just me, I'd still be right. If there were 10 of 'em on a BBS, all in a circle "validating" each other, I'd still be "right".

Sorry, Charlie. Just because you can find someone else who can't respect the rights of others doesn't mean someone who will is not "right".

Arf

The whole thread (24 posts)

A slightly different opinion from those who lost people on 9/11 - Tom Brosz - 3/8/2004 8:25:43 PM
- The liberals don't give a flip about the 911 families or decency. It is all about controlling what we discuss in the election - ebnelson - 3/9/2004 4:23:57 AM
- Back to basics. Remedial Decency 10. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 1:11:37 AM
  - If you liked that ad, boy have we got a great follow-up! - RNC staffer - 3/9/2004 4:54:52 AM
  - re: Back to basics. - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 2:45:08 AM
    - Now let's focus, Tom. It's NOT about Clinton. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 5:53:36 AM
      - Am I going too fast for you? - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 7:42:25 AM
        
        You're post raises even more questions. - Bowser - 3/9/2004 2:13:02 PM
        
        More on this - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 7:37:57 PM
        
        re: more questions. - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 5:59:36 PM
        
        Making political profit from dancing on the graves - - - - Bowser - 3/9/2004 6:19:57 PM
        
        Man overboard. - RobVG - 3/9/2004 6:47:53 PM
        
        And you call it what? (n/t) - Bowser - 3/9/2004 8:55:56 PM
        
        Right down the 3rd base line. Fair- not foul. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/9/2004 9:18:10 PM
        
        Could be a 3 bagger if the fielder loses it in his mutt. (n/t) - gbaikie - 3/10/2004 4:36:56 AM
        
        You want to think again on that? - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 6:43:47 PM
        
        You don't want to know if it could have been prevented? - Bowser - 3/9/2004 9:04:31 PM
        
        Dodge and weave - Tom Brosz - 3/10/2004 12:17:32 AM
        
        You must know RobVG. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/10/2004 12:31:34 AM
        
        You're chasing your own tail again. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/9/2004 9:42:57 PM
        
        I beginning to think you disagree. Crossing my mind, anyway. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/9/2004 10:07:00 PM
        
        I disagree - RobVG - 3/9/2004 10:48:44 PM
        
        I thought so. You must know Tom B. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/10/2004 4:39:42 AM
- A small note on media tilt - Tom Brosz - 3/8/2004 8:29:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (24 posts)