re: Method of Mars colonization, question

Space/Science » in reply to re: Method of Mars colonization, question

Hans — 3/15/2004 8:20:00 PM (archived)

I would consider the Antarctic a scientific expedition and not a colony. A colony would have a full spectrum (in time) of humanity and be working towards self-sufficiency

The whole thread (11 posts)

Method of Mars colonization, question - Hans - 3/15/2004 8:59:10 AM
- re: Exploration - Raoul - 3/15/2004 7:05:41 PM
- re: Method of Mars colonization, question - gbaikie - 3/15/2004 10:16:17 AM
  - There are treaty restrictions concerning Antartica, try Greenland - Gary - 3/16/2004 7:33:59 AM
    - A few dozen people would be enough to start a colony. - Lee - 3/16/2004 9:34:09 AM
      - re: Wishful thinking - Success_Machine - 3/16/2004 11:48:52 AM
        
        The endangered species act isn't based on science. - Lee - 3/17/2004 6:10:40 AM
        
        re: True. It is an extrapolation. However, you can't colonize Mars with 3 people. (n/t) - Success_Machine - 3/17/2004 11:51:23 AM
  - re: Method of Mars colonization, question - Hans - 3/15/2004 8:20:00 PM
    - re: Method of Mars colonization, question - gbaikie - 3/16/2004 3:11:57 AM
  - re: You need upwards of 10,000 people to effectively colonize - Success_Machine - 3/15/2004 3:06:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (11 posts)