Okay, so now Woodward is lying.

O'Niel is a liar. Shinseki is a fruit and an implied liar. O'Neil is a liar. Clarke is a lair.

(Ah yes, but call Bush a liar and thats uncalled for here?)

Its interesting how these liars can be so consistent with eachother. Its interesting how close to the inside these liars were. So are we to postulate a greand conspiracy that cuts through high level staff, Army officials and the press? Or maybe occams razor applies.

I am very interested, of course, in hearing the bombastic explications of why it doesn't, and how all of these 'liars' are not really mutually consistent, and how the things written in black and white don't really mean what they really say, or say what they mean or ....

Please, by all means... With voices high in chorus. Explain this to me.

Davin L.