I notice that while Tom keeps Kerry in the singular, you immediately jump to a prejudicial plural reference, demanding that any comment against the man must be defined as anti-veterans of foreign wars.

Interesting, in a twisted light.

You know, outside Bowserland people are allowed to have opinions about individuals -- regardless of where they served. I seem to recall that Kerry came home and was all for dismantling the mighty war machine, which included dismantling the U.S. Militaries. That's fine, as it was a common goal for many Americans, just as it is today.

Back in reality, my main point remains unanswered. Without diving off some other deep end, try to focus:

If this odd desire -- in the middle of a war, mind you -- for the dismantling U.S. Militaries is not an anti-military aim to you, then what is?

Dan