I like some EVIDENCE too. There isn't any, only innuendo.

David F Mayer — 5/17/2004 8:16:32 PM (archived)

What probably happened was that a couple of boxcar loads of either ammunition or ammonium nitrate went off. That is all it takes.

If something more sinister was involved, I would like to see some EVIDENCE. So far, not forthcoming.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Ryongchon Explosion Occurred While Transporting Military Cargo? - RobVG - 5/17/2004 3:54:20 PM
- PIGPILE! - Bowser - 5/17/2004 7:54:45 PM
  - I like some EVIDENCE too. There isn't any, only innuendo. - David F Mayer - 5/17/2004 8:16:32 PM
    - Oh yeah? Prove it WASN'T some secret weapon! (Just kidding. I agree with you.) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/17/2004 11:07:59 PM
- No 'Axis of Evil", no WMD programs, nothing to see here folks, move along... (n/t) - p - 5/17/2004 4:40:11 PM
- re: Ryongchon Explosion - Tom Brosz - 5/17/2004 4:25:15 PM
  - It was said on Fox that the cargo was a "warhead" - RobVG - 5/17/2004 4:48:07 PM
    - The statement was made by Van Hipp. (n/t) - RobVG - 5/17/2004 7:32:51 PM
    - The important thing is to make sure conjecture and facts are well-labeled here. And at least reasonable. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/17/2004 4:56:25 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (9 posts)