I thought we just plaid twister for a year so that WMD wasn't the reason we went into Iraq... Now 1 shell justifies us going into Iraq? Sorry, help me out here.
1 episode of Sarin is significant. But recall: In Syria they just broke up an attempt to brew chemical weapons for use in a terrorist attack. Why are we so sure that the origin for the Chem weapon was Iraqi?
Even so... honestly and without bluster: Does one ineffectual shell make up an active NukeChemBio program that we supposedly invaded to defend against?
Oh, is this where you switch back to this being about liberation and freedom? The land in which we judge setting dogs on terrified imprisoned human beings tantamount to fraternity hazings?
This is the king of lost causes. You'll believe until the very end.
GW
Current Events » in reply to Flexible standards of proof
Wait.... I'm confused
