point taken re moondust and engine failure

Space/Science » in reply to re: hey - thanks

Daniel — 7/8/2004 7:00:43 AM (archived)

that's why the multiple-engine pressured moonbus from '2001' is just the solution for medium distance travel! .. for longer distances, Tom's ballistic trajectories would have to be used.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Moonbus - Raoul - 7/4/2004 10:47:49 AM
- and your favorite Moonbus design would be ..? - Daniel L - 7/6/2004 12:35:14 PM
  - It was cool, but highly impractical. - Tom Brosz - 7/6/2004 7:02:54 PM
    - actually, now that you mention it - - Daniel - 7/6/2004 7:43:32 PM
      - re: Flying or driving - Raoul - 7/7/2004 4:22:14 PM
        
        what about jet packs though? - Daniel - 7/7/2004 5:38:40 PM
        
        NASA considered them in the 1960s - Larry J - 7/7/2004 7:46:38 PM
        
        hey - thanks - Daniel - 7/7/2004 8:13:18 PM
        
        re: hey - thanks - Larry J - 7/7/2004 8:57:27 PM
        
        point taken re moondust and engine failure - Daniel - 7/8/2004 7:00:43 AM
  - re: Aah, Lux Aeterna! - Raoul - 7/6/2004 5:26:49 PM
- You're right - Buck Galaxy - 7/5/2004 2:55:24 AM
  - Weather reports - Tom Brosz - 7/5/2004 5:18:41 PM
    - re: Weather reports - Raoul - 7/5/2004 8:29:40 PM
      - Moon base - Buck Galaxy - 7/6/2004 2:36:05 AM
  - re: shielding - Raoul - 7/5/2004 5:30:46 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)