There is no such thing as "fundamental errors in his entire ideology".
First, you have defined WHAT his ideology is, which is purely a subjective judgment. I, and probably he, would not agree with what you have decided his ideology to be.
Second, you have declared that definition you have fabricated as erroneous, which is again a purely subjective judgment. Again, I have no doubt there are many who would disagree with you.
Third, the very idea of ideology is subjective. There is no such thing as a right or wrong one. There are just the ones you like and the ones you don't. You may have good reasons for liking them or not, but they are your reasons. No one else is under any obligation to subscribe to them.
But we do apparently agree on one thing. The lady is dumber than a sack full of hammers. And so are her followers.
Current Events » in reply to Re: Can you believe her ignorance?
Re: Can you believe her ignorance?
The whole thread (31 posts)
- Can you believe her ignorance?