re: bad jet fuel?

Current Events » in reply to If it wasn't terrorism, it's hard to think what it might've been

re: bad jet fuel?

Scott Evil — 8/25/2004 2:44:52 PM (archived)

My guess is terrorism as well. Even if it turns out that mechanical failure caused both accidents, I would be interested in who was doing the alledged maintenance. Were they doing a shoddy job because of negligence or as a form of sinister terror?

The whole thread (11 posts)

Russia under attack? - Tom Brosz - 8/25/2004 4:01:38 AM
- If it wasn't terrorism, it's hard to think what it might've been - Larry J - 8/25/2004 1:41:00 PM
  - re: bad jet fuel? - Scott Evil - 8/25/2004 2:44:52 PM
    - Seems unlikely - Larry J - 8/25/2004 2:54:46 PM
      - I suggest possible modes of sabotage that might have been used. - David F Mayer - 8/25/2004 6:02:40 PM
        
        re: I suggest possible modes of sabotage that might have been used. - Larry J - 8/25/2004 7:24:32 PM
      - first 2 guesses - SA7 or altitude switch bombs by ground crew infiltrators - E.P. Grondine - 8/25/2004 3:09:27 PM
        
        SA7's are very short ranged missiles - Larry J - 8/25/2004 3:59:16 PM
        
        time switches - E.P. Grondine - 8/25/2004 4:28:39 PM
  - My guess is either Chechnya or Al Qaeda (n/t) - David F Mayer - 8/25/2004 2:02:35 PM
- Scary stuff -- Tough deal for the Russians - Gary - 8/25/2004 5:16:47 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (11 posts)