Current Events » in reply to So you have hard evidence he would have gone in a year later?

The whole thread (14 posts)

• More Navy records support Kerry - Donald - 8/27/2004 1:41:19 PM
  • Talking points not yet published? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/27/2004 4:52:40 PM
    • Tom got em in the nick of time. (n/t) - Tony - 8/27/2004 9:20:19 PM
      • Hey, I WRITE the frigging talking points! ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/28/2004 6:11:20 AM
  • Meanwhile: Republican paper goes for Kerry - Donald - 8/27/2004 2:34:50 PM
    • The true hypocrits - Donald - 8/27/2004 2:41:56 PM
      • Kerry applied for a deferment. - Tom Brosz - 8/27/2004 6:59:53 PM
        • re: A year deferment postpones your enlistment. It doesn't stop it. It was the late 1960s the war wasn't going to end soon... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/27/2004 9:19:32 PM
          • So you have hard evidence he would have gone in a year later? - Tom Brosz - 8/27/2004 9:25:51 PM
            • re: Yes, he asked for a year deferment. It's in the records... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/27/2004 11:38:18 PM
              • A year is the maximum. Then you renew it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/28/2004 12:17:37 AM
                • You mean Kerry might have being planing to go down the road Cheney took all five times??? I'm shock! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/28/2004 3:11:15 AM
                  • I guess we'll never know. He was turned down for his first attempt. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/28/2004 5:26:42 AM
                    • re: Or the alternative was he wanted to go to Paris before joining up...naw that might be true...and that does fit with the Republican Swift Boaters for Lies stories.... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/28/2004 7:24:55 AM