re: So you do see that the reason the survey was limited to 8 provinces was security.

Current Events » in reply to So you do see that the reason the survey was limited to 8 provinces was security.

gbaikie — 9/5/2004 3:10:43 AM (archived)

"So you do see that the reason the survey was limited to 8 provinces was security."

No, I see it as mostly a transportation problem. And this transportation problem, not only limit "officals" of some aid program, but also inhibits the flow of general population and information/trade that comes with people traveling.

The whole thread (14 posts)

"Promises, promises, I'm all through with promises - - - - Bowser - 9/3/2004 8:02:30 PM
- Keep trolling for the dumb ones...you will feel at home (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/4/2004 3:35:52 AM
- Who do you think you're fooling - FrankC - 9/3/2004 9:05:21 PM
  - Not you, FrankC. Not you. I'm trolling for the dumb ones. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/3/2004 9:43:30 PM
- I see your two articles, and raise you... - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 8:28:39 PM
  - Methodology of the survey - Mary Anne - 9/4/2004 1:21:01 AM
    - re: Methodology of the survey - gbaikie - 9/4/2004 5:29:39 AM
      - Roads? NGOs have jeeps these days. - Mary Anne - 9/4/2004 12:21:47 PM
        
        re: Roads? NGOs have jeeps these days. - gbaikie - 9/4/2004 1:36:44 PM
        
        So you do see that the reason the survey was limited to 8 provinces was security. - Mary Anne - 9/4/2004 3:16:49 PM
        
        re: So you do see that the reason the survey was limited to 8 provinces was security. - gbaikie - 9/5/2004 3:10:43 AM
    - Remember... - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2004 1:35:10 AM
  - Interesting articles. The blog I don't trust, but the other one seems credible. - Bowser - 9/3/2004 9:01:39 PM
    - re: Interesting articles - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 11:06:25 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (14 posts)