Do you have details for that, or just talking points?

Current Events » in reply to re: ". . .withdrawing support for them [American troops] when they need it."

Tom Brosz — 9/7/2004 1:00:43 AM (archived)

I know that some bills have gone out to make veteran's funding mandatory spending instead of under discretionary, and these have not gone over well. Is this what you're talking about? Does that indicate a lack of concern for veterans, or just some caution on creating yet another bottomless entitlement?

Would vetoing NASA funding cuts, which also are lumped into the veteran's spending category, count as being "anti-veteran?"

More information, please.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Car Bomb Near Fallujah Kills 7 Marines - Donald - 9/6/2004 1:38:55 PM
- "Bring 'em on!", he said. "Bring 'em on!" (n/t) - Bowser - 9/6/2004 6:13:27 PM
- Your thousand death snuff-orgasm is nearly here - ebnelson - 9/6/2004 3:58:32 PM
  - Thank George Bush for that - Donald - 9/6/2004 5:44:50 PM
    - And Kerry voted for sending them, although your 1000 casualty goal - ebnelson - 9/6/2004 5:53:26 PM
      - re: ". . .withdrawing support for them [American troops] when they need it." - Mary Anne - 9/7/2004 12:15:43 AM
        
        Do you have details for that, or just talking points? - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2004 1:00:43 AM
        
        re: Do you have details for that, or just talking points? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2004 2:23:26 AM
        
        Half a billion dollar increase = spending cuts? - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2004 7:47:22 AM
        
        re: Do you have details for that, or just talking points? - gbaikie - 9/7/2004 3:54:20 AM
        
        No, it is more like helping to found VVAW, with the leader a proven fraud - ebnelson - 9/7/2004 12:47:53 AM
- Meanwhile: Wounded soldiers neglected by Bush administration - Donald - 9/6/2004 1:44:47 PM
  - This could be one really hot issue for Kerry - E.P. Grondine - 9/6/2004 2:54:18 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)