I'm not in the numbers either, Bowser.

Current Events » in reply to According to some, or one, it's still messed up.

Tom Brosz — 9/6/2004 7:06:57 PM (archived)

And I make a lot more than a squeegee operator. Or have we already shifted to the "they're all BAD jobs" scenario again?

I think I've pointed out here that, politically, it doesn't matter what the job numbers do. When a statistic looks good, the Democrats will jump to another method of measurement. This has already been proven over the past year.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Answers On The Jobs Number Surveys - Mark Eby - 9/6/2004 6:05:31 PM
- According to some, or one, it's still messed up. - Bowser - 9/6/2004 6:12:06 PM
  - I'm not in the numbers either, Bowser. - Tom Brosz - 9/6/2004 7:06:57 PM
    - re:Losing ground - Raoul - 9/6/2004 8:55:36 PM
      - A Possible Explanation - Mark Eby - 9/7/2004 12:59:45 AM
        
        re: A Possible Explanation - gbaikie - 9/7/2004 1:30:46 AM
        
        It Normally Takes 6 Months For Jobs to Follow GDP Upward - Mark Eby - 9/7/2004 1:44:03 AM
        
        re: It Normally Takes 6 Months For Jobs to Follow GDP Upward - gbaikie - 9/7/2004 2:57:13 AM
        
        Unemployment Was At Historic Lows Going In - Mark Eby - 9/7/2004 3:46:34 AM
        
        Jobs created and lost - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2004 7:11:04 AM
        
        re: Unemployment Was At Historic Lows Going In - gbaikie - 9/7/2004 4:26:23 AM
        
        Oops should be worker shortage - gb - 9/7/2004 1:35:46 AM
      - re: re:Losing ground - gbaikie - 9/6/2004 10:45:14 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)