The tax cuts are being invested in shifting jobs overseas rather than reinvested at home as they must to trickle down. A secondary effect is never the way to assure the result you want, but Bush was more interested in benefitting his primary constituents than america at large. He probably did believe in the trickle down effect, but his contributors probably knew all along where they were going to invest.

Pure conjectural logic guys nothing else, but try and find the flaw or a better explanation for why this economic jobs recovery is so sorry compared to the last recession which had no tax cuts.

Regards,
Mark