Who believes that a man who couldn't type would use a very expensive typewriter to put together simple memos? Why would anyone do things like swap out typewheels to do a superscript in a simple memo?
Apply Occam's Razor:
On the one hand, we have a document that can be perfectly recreated in about 5 minutes using default settings on Microsoft Word.
On the other hand, using a very expensive typewriter and a lot of training, you can get fairly close to duplicating the memos with a lot of effort.
Which is the most likely explaination?
That doesn't even begin to address the other problems with the document, such as referring to a nonexistent manual (there was no AFM 35-13), ordering someone to do something "IAW" the manual (it isn't done), pressure supposedly being applied by a man who'd retired 18 months earlier, etc.
Seriously, if you still believe those memos are legit, then you're a dope.
Current Events » in reply to re:Yes expert can disagree. Your point?
Most experts do agree that the documents are forgeries
The whole thread (12 posts)
- Right-wing clamed hoax, a hoax in itself
- The problem is with CBS
- re: However, as one who has used an IBM Selectric II typewriter
- Good luck with drinking that type of koolaid. CBS and Kerry are only fooling the sheep. (n/t)
