And you don't answer them.

1441 threatened severe consequences for noncompliance. Is war not a severe consequence?

1441 referenced previous resolutions authorizing force explicitly.

Iraq has been in a continuous state of hostilities with the US since GW1 by attacking UN sanctioned flights enforcing the no fly zones.

Your arguments are bogus Raoul. They always have been. The US was enforcing UN resolutions against an enemy who had been continuously attacking US forces for over 10 years while they were engaged in a UN sanctioned mission. That the head of the UN claims it was illegal to enforce UN Security Council Resolutions says far more about how ineffective the UN is than how outrageous US behavior has been.

Regards,
Mark