Current Events » in reply to Of course not, Geez

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Science Issues - alcaray - 9/17/2004 4:19:25 PM
  • The article claims we 'quit' Kyoto, but we never joined it. (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/17/2004 8:36:55 PM
    • We were at Kyoto at the summit through most of the process. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/18/2004 1:40:09 AM
      • In 1997, the Senate voted 95-0 against the Kyoto Accord - Larry J - 9/19/2004 4:10:33 PM
      • Why Is This Pattern So Common? - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 2:34:31 AM
        • Anybody that can rationalize "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" - - - - Bowser - 9/18/2004 3:01:34 AM
          • Why Can't You Focus On Real Issues? - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 3:12:50 AM
        • Why do you correct me, who got it right? Instead of Ed, who got it wrong? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/18/2004 2:44:48 AM
          • You Got it Wrong - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 3:05:43 AM
            • I guess I did, sorry Ed. - alcaray - 9/18/2004 3:33:58 AM
    • re: And that is all you got out of the article? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/17/2004 10:11:24 PM
      • No, it is just another piece designed to bolster Kerry - ebnelson - 9/18/2004 2:02:27 AM
        • They asked questions and published the replies - alcaray - 9/18/2004 2:17:51 AM
          • Well, we know Bush - SteveS - 9/18/2004 2:52:14 AM
            • So you advocate reading only the Bush part of the article? - alcaray - 9/18/2004 2:57:22 AM
              • Of course not, Geez (n/t) - SteveS - 9/18/2004 4:38:47 PM
                • Then: "OK to read but know that everything Kerry says is a lie; everything Bush says is the truth"? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/18/2004 5:06:53 PM
      • re: And that is all you got out of the article? - gbaikie - 9/18/2004 1:23:14 AM