What Exactly Do You Think Giving France A Veto Over Our Security Means?

Current Events » in reply to Does anyone on this board think we should let France lead?

Mark Eby — 9/18/2004 6:02:47 PM (archived)

And yes there are many here who have faulted us for not getting France's OK when it should have been obvious they were not going to do it under any circumstances.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (24 posts)

"Putin: Russia to tackle terrorism â€˜preventivelyâ€™" - Bowser - 9/18/2004 3:14:54 AM
- Upping the ante. - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:32:42 AM
  - So, the US tries to encourage peaceful dialog between the two - SteveS - 9/18/2004 4:14:12 PM
    - Interesting comments, not related to my post however. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/18/2004 6:34:22 PM
      - response to the whole thread (n/t) - SteveS - 9/18/2004 6:56:34 PM
- That You Think This Is Funny Says It All (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 4:14:52 AM
  - You can't see that the dilemma Bush would be in is interesting? - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:23:11 AM
    - Terrorism Is Not A Joke, But The Democrats Response IS - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 4:28:39 AM
      - re: You're painting with a very wide brush there..hey why not just say the Human Response IS and be done with it... - Chris Vancil - 9/18/2004 7:27:54 AM
        
        I'm Referring To The Democratically Popular The Let France Or The UN Lead Refrain - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 2:04:00 PM
        
        Does anyone on this board think we should let France lead? - alcaray - 9/18/2004 5:04:24 PM
        
        What Exactly Do You Think Giving France A Veto Over Our Security Means? - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 6:02:47 PM
        
        re: Are you talking about the UN Security Council structure? Do you know any of the UN's history? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/19/2004 7:58:29 AM
        
        Yes (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/19/2004 1:13:25 PM
        
        re: Then blame us the USA... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/19/2004 8:03:58 PM
        
        No I'll Blame The Two Countries Who Limited The Effectiveness of UN Resolutions On Iraq - France & Russia (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/20/2004 1:01:59 AM
        
        re: So in fact you don't know the history of the UN. What do you think a veto is for? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/20/2004 9:06:52 AM
        
        It Appears You Think It's For Limiting The Effectiveness Of Previous UN Resolutions - Mark Eby - 9/20/2004 11:06:13 AM
        
        No, John Forbes Kerry does not post here (n/t) - p - 9/18/2004 5:07:42 PM
      - It's way, way over your head. Quit while you're a behind. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:33:44 AM
        
        As Usual You've Got It Backwards (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 2:01:34 PM
        
        All things considered that sounds like a post to yourself. - FrankC - 9/18/2004 5:35:19 AM
        
        Phonies. Let's compare hypothetical (imaginary) with the real thing. - Bowser - 9/18/2004 12:31:16 PM
        
        Yes You Are - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 6:45:59 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (24 posts)