Current Events » in reply to re: So in fact you don't know the history of the UN. What do you think a veto is for?

The whole thread (24 posts)

• "Putin: Russia to tackle terrorism ‘preventively’" - Bowser - 9/18/2004 3:14:54 AM
  • Upping the ante. - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:32:42 AM
    • So, the US tries to encourage peaceful dialog between the two - SteveS - 9/18/2004 4:14:12 PM
      • Interesting comments, not related to my post however. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/18/2004 6:34:22 PM
        • response to the whole thread (n/t) - SteveS - 9/18/2004 6:56:34 PM
  • That You Think This Is Funny Says It All (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 4:14:52 AM
    • You can't see that the dilemma Bush would be in is interesting? - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:23:11 AM
      • Terrorism Is Not A Joke, But The Democrats Response IS - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 4:28:39 AM
        • re: You're painting with a very wide brush there..hey why not just say the Human Response IS and be done with it... - Chris Vancil - 9/18/2004 7:27:54 AM
          • I'm Referring To The Democratically Popular The Let France Or The UN Lead Refrain - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 2:04:00 PM
            • Does anyone on this board think we should let France lead? - alcaray - 9/18/2004 5:04:24 PM
              • What Exactly Do You Think Giving France A Veto Over Our Security Means? - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 6:02:47 PM
                • re: Are you talking about the UN Security Council structure? Do you know any of the UN's history? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/19/2004 7:58:29 AM
                  • Yes (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/19/2004 1:13:25 PM
                    • re: Then blame us the USA... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/19/2004 8:03:58 PM
                      • No I'll Blame The Two Countries Who Limited The Effectiveness of UN Resolutions On Iraq - France & Russia (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/20/2004 1:01:59 AM
                        • re: So in fact you don't know the history of the UN. What do you think a veto is for? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/20/2004 9:06:52 AM
                          • It Appears You Think It's For Limiting The Effectiveness Of Previous UN Resolutions - Mark Eby - 9/20/2004 11:06:13 AM
              • No, John Forbes Kerry does not post here (n/t) - p - 9/18/2004 5:07:42 PM
        • It's way, way over your head. Quit while you're a behind. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/18/2004 4:33:44 AM
          • As Usual You've Got It Backwards (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 2:01:34 PM
          • All things considered that sounds like a post to yourself. - FrankC - 9/18/2004 5:35:19 AM
            • Phonies. Let's compare hypothetical (imaginary) with the real thing. - Bowser - 9/18/2004 12:31:16 PM
              • Yes You Are - Mark Eby - 9/18/2004 6:45:59 PM