Bowser's title:"Terrorists are essentially free to censor news coverage or even alter it by intimidation whereas Coalition Forces are strictly forbidden from even thinking about it."
Bowser says: "You're kidding, of course." Blah, Blah,...

Bowser, the: "". Are quotes. These quotes have various of uses. One common use, is to copy exactly what someone else has said.
Therefore:
"In other words, Reuters must amend its copy to suit or its reporters may be harmed. This is another aspect of asymmetrical warfare that goes unrecognized. Terrorists are essentially free to censor news coverage or even alter it by intimidation whereas Coalition Forces are strictly forbidden from even thinking about it."
Is something written at- http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/

I didn't write this passage. I'm quoting it.
The author of these words is a blogger writing at http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/
[btw, the blogger's name is wretchard and once again, I do not have an identity known as wretchard. And just for the record, I only use one identity on the web and it is gbaikie - this is my handle.]

Is this sinking in?
Or are you still confused?