flip-flop?

Space/Science » in reply to Update: and here's the patented flip-flop

flip-flop?

ken murphy — 10/21/2004 4:55:06 AM (archived)

Is it possible that we were all a little heady back in January at the prospect that NASA might be given the marching orders to do something beyond LEO?

I know that my thoughts on where things stand have evolved since January. Does that make me a flip-flopper too?

And what's wrong with a little good old-fashioned ambition? Isn't that a little part of what made this nation great?

The whole thread (9 posts)

Candidates' surrogates debate space policy - phil - 10/19/2004 3:09:38 PM
- Did Garver or Seitzen get appointed to do this, or did they appoint themselves? - E.P. Grondine - 10/21/2004 1:44:29 AM
- Update: and here's the patented flip-flop - phil - 10/20/2004 3:00:09 PM
  - flip-flop? - ken murphy - 10/21/2004 4:55:06 AM
  - re: Hum, Garver tried give support to Bush's new SEI on 1/14/04 and now doesn't? Is that anything like Bush's own lack of interest in his own SEI? Who exactly is flip flopping here folks? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/20/2004 11:07:54 PM
- re: It would seem Spudis Disagrees with you, - Chris Vancil - 10/19/2004 11:39:29 PM
  - "Might" support moon & Mars, now THERE's a definitive stance - phil - 10/20/2004 2:42:50 PM
    - re: Yes, well it took the Columbia tragedy, congress and space fans to make Bush one time be interested in space (till polls changed his mind). Not a peep since... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/20/2004 10:59:06 PM
- re: Garver and Sietzen - Raoul - 10/19/2004 4:50:55 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (9 posts)