Current Events » in reply to And explain this Pentagon confirmation

The whole thread (37 posts)

• The worst may be yet to come in Iraq - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:22:34 PM
  • Tracking Inspections Jan 2003 - Jack Herer - 10/26/2004 4:59:31 PM
  • And, of course, the question nobody is asking... - Tom Brosz - 10/26/2004 3:54:02 PM
    • Why didn't the UN inspectors burn it? - Gary - 10/26/2004 4:27:53 PM
  • Ewww....Comic Guy says, "Worst Thread Ever!" ;) - Tom Brosz - 10/26/2004 3:21:37 PM
    • Isn't it interesting that.... - Gary - 10/26/2004 3:37:36 PM
      • Drudgereport is running with this story on the MSM (n/t) - Gary - 10/26/2004 3:49:31 PM
  • Turns out the claims aboutt he missing explosives was 'incorrect', Don. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 1:58:22 PM
    • So let me get this straight, Ed... - Donald - 10/26/2004 2:15:44 PM
      • Get it straight, if you can: The explosives were not there. It is the museum lie told much larger. - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:30:02 PM
        • Off the deep end - Donald - 10/26/2004 2:48:19 PM
          • PS: How to tell when Don knows he has lost an argument - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:55:22 PM
            • whereas we know you've lost when you resort to base insult - Davin L. - 10/26/2004 5:17:55 PM
              • He's lost at life - that's why he leads with "a base insult". No content, empty. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/26/2004 8:00:32 PM
              • You only wish it were so. - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 5:45:06 PM
          • Yes, those pesky eye witnesses get in the way of agenda driven news. And I am sure you still think the documents were 'fake but accurate'. You seem to enjoy a diet of bs, Don. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:52:51 PM
            • A scarab beetle rolling his ball of dung (n/t) - Gary - 10/26/2004 3:40:14 PM
              • re: So you have come to the same conclusion about Ed as I have. He is a RNC dung roller! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/26/2004 11:43:17 PM
      • What exactly about this article... - Donald - 10/26/2004 2:20:21 PM
        • And explain this Pentagon confirmation - Donald - 10/26/2004 2:22:42 PM
          • I doubt it. I would bet the context is very different. - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:31:40 PM
            • Hey Ed. Black is black and white is white. (n/t) - LJ - 10/26/2004 3:16:14 PM
              • Speaking of black and white, CBS was going to do another sham report hit on the Bush Administration. - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 4:05:02 PM
  • Bush cover-up exposed - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:48:46 PM
    • But the claim is false, so the coverup is false, Don (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:05:14 PM
  • Bush's blunders in Iraq - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:47:29 PM
    • So another critique based on a false premise, Don. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:05:57 PM
  • Iraq's missing explosives - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:40:16 PM
    • Yet another condemnation based on a false premise, Don. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:06:37 PM
  • Worse Than the Usual Bad - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:34:39 PM
    • Don, you wouldn't be trying to do a 'james' and just spam bs here, would you? (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:07:25 PM
  • Making Things Worse - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:30:37 PM
    • But since Al Zarqaiw has always been Al Qaeda, why is this news? - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:08:55 PM
  • Slaughter and sloppiness - Donald - 10/26/2004 1:24:23 PM
    • laughter of Iraqi heroes you say are unworthy of our support, and 'theft' of explosives that weren't even there. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:10:03 PM
      • I think there's an s-hole somehere... (n/t) - LJ - 10/26/2004 4:36:39 PM
      • re:(s) laughter of Iraqi heroes you say are unworthy of our support, and 'theft' of explosives that weren't even there. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/26/2004 2:10:41 PM