BTW...

Current Events » in reply to re: So you are saying every attack they analyzed the traces of the explosives used? Your proof?

BTW...

Tom Brosz — 10/28/2004 5:50:28 AM (archived)

Nobody has the slightest shred of evidence, not reports, not anything, that this type of explosive has been used by the insurgents or terrorists. Yet Kerry is running around right now claiming that these missing explosives are being used against our troops.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Experts ponder missing Iraq weapons - Chris Vancil - 10/26/2004 11:38:13 PM
- NOW everybody's excited about weapons that are not accounted for? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 12:42:22 AM
- Experts ponder misconception - SteveS - 10/27/2004 12:19:16 AM
  - re: What an absurd argument. - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 1:04:07 AM
    - That's funny - SteveS - 10/27/2004 12:58:11 PM
      - Funnier still is we went in to sercure WMD and they didn't bother to sercure this possible components. - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:20:43 PM
    - The Pentagon has stated that these explosives have not yet been used. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 4:19:38 AM
      - re: And we should believe them because? They have egg on their collective face and sure to hell are not going to make it worse. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:00:59 AM
        
        Zero evidence. Zero. - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 7:00:32 PM
        
        re: So you are saying every attack they analyzed the traces of the explosives used? Your proof? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:23:19 PM
        
        BTW... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2004 5:50:28 AM
        
        Yes. Most of the time they do. - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2004 5:47:50 AM
        
        re: I think you are wrong. Anyway it would take only one bombing for my statement to be true. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/28/2004 11:11:20 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)