Current Events » in reply to re: So you are saying every attack they analyzed the traces of the explosives used? Your proof?

The whole thread (13 posts)

• Experts ponder missing Iraq weapons - Chris Vancil - 10/26/2004 11:38:13 PM
  • NOW everybody's excited about weapons that are not accounted for? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 12:42:22 AM
  • Experts ponder misconception - SteveS - 10/27/2004 12:19:16 AM
    • re: What an absurd argument. - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 1:04:07 AM
      • That's funny - SteveS - 10/27/2004 12:58:11 PM
        • Funnier still is we went in to sercure WMD and they didn't bother to sercure this possible components. - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:20:43 PM
      • The Pentagon has stated that these explosives have not yet been used. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 4:19:38 AM
        • re: And we should believe them because? They have egg on their collective face and sure to hell are not going to make it worse. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:00:59 AM
          • Zero evidence. Zero. - Tom Brosz - 10/27/2004 7:00:32 PM
            • re: So you are saying every attack they analyzed the traces of the explosives used? Your proof? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/27/2004 10:23:19 PM
              • BTW... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2004 5:50:28 AM
              • Yes. Most of the time they do. - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2004 5:47:50 AM
                • re: I think you are wrong. Anyway it would take only one bombing for my statement to be true. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/28/2004 11:11:20 PM