Flame » in reply to Red State vs. Blue State attitudes

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Red State vs. Blue State attitudes - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2004 10:34:59 PM
  • Hilarious, thanks Tom (n/t) - McFly - 10/30/2004 1:24:03 PM
  • Q.E.D. - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2004 7:43:19 PM
    • I think neither are insults. - Tony - 10/29/2004 9:33:00 PM
      • You are aware that I'm talking philosophies, not actual physical locations, right? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/29/2004 10:40:14 PM
        • Yes. Wanna answer the question? (n/t) - tony - 10/30/2004 2:37:48 PM
          • Did it ever occur to you that I might not have been talking about you personally? - Tom Brosz - 10/31/2004 6:39:06 AM
            • Not playing thick or taking it personally. - Tony - 11/1/2004 10:03:19 PM
              • re: playing thick - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2004 6:43:57 AM
                • The question : Wanna tell me what this blue-stater doesn't get? (n/t) - Tony - 11/2/2004 2:25:21 PM
                  • My post, reworded: - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2004 6:06:22 PM
  • Thanks for showing us......... - Pkublius - 10/29/2004 2:16:27 PM
  • Oooh, ooh, i get it....... - Tony - 10/29/2004 1:57:10 PM
    • No, you don't either. - Mary Anne - 11/1/2004 3:00:20 AM
      • "...Republicans think it's all about hair." Okay, there's a good example of someone not getting it. - Tom Brosz - 11/1/2004 5:08:47 PM
        • The Bush campaign does seem to think its all about... - alcaray - 11/1/2004 5:59:08 PM
  • re: Red State vs. Blue State attitudes - gbaikie - 10/28/2004 11:10:41 PM
  • What don't I get? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/28/2004 10:57:42 PM