For what possible reason would that be redacted? – Current Events – HabitableZone

Current Events

Recent posts

Recent posts

Fewer Transient Alerts coming BuckGalaxy November 2, 2026 5:48 pm (Space/Science)
This report from Congress came out last week... podrock November 1, 2026 11:22 pm (Current Events)
Happy Halloween podrock October 31, 2026 3:03 am (Off Topic)
Expect one hell of a recession/depression in 2027 Arrell October 31, 2026 1:16 am (Current Events)
Next week will get ugly.... Arrell October 30, 2026 2:02 pm (Current Events)
Sir Patrick Stewart. podrock October 30, 2026 11:52 am (Off Topic)
Bernie Taupin. A great interview podrock October 30, 2026 3:05 am (Off Topic)
A new Dwarf Planet? Arrell October 30, 2026 12:49 am (Space/Science)
John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 17, 2025 5:00 am (Space/Science)
"Engage!" BuckGalaxy October 29, 2026 10:58 pm (Off Topic)

On this day in Current Events

1 year ago (that week) Bunker Envy ? 4 replies · Oct 30, 2025
10 years ago (that week) This election feels like waiting for the results of a cancer x-ray 14 replies · Nov 5, 2016

Log in
Register

Current Events » in reply to Could that be in the redacted content?

For what possible reason would that be redacted?

Tom Brosz — 11/19/2004 8:36:42 PM (archived)

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (6 posts)

Clarke discredited...again - p - 11/19/2004 5:59:07 PM
- So, liking what he said in his testimony equals discrediting his testimony? - alcaray - 11/19/2004 6:15:49 PM
  - Yes, since what he claimed he'd said is NOT there - phil - 11/19/2004 8:05:59 PM
    - Could that be in the redacted content? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/19/2004 8:29:25 PM
      - For what possible reason would that be redacted? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/19/2004 8:36:42 PM
        
        "national security", I guess - alcaray - 11/22/2004 4:53:45 PM

HabitableZone — be civil, or at least entertaining.