re: Apparently their regression analysis was poorly designed.

Current Events » in reply to The only way to verify electronic voting shows they may have stolen Florida (too).

Scott Evil — 11/22/2004 9:46:59 PM (archived)

For example: Why didn't they use a more recent correlation (such as votes for/against Janet Reno in 2002)? The Answer: Because it didn't give then the results they desired.

Also: Some of the variables they used would obviously overlap causing all kinds of discrepancies in any statistical results.

It sounds like a real good case of "multiple regression bunk" to me.

Scott Evil

P.S. I'd love to see the politics of the "scientists" who were involved in the study...The funny thing is there is ALWAYS a direct correlation between the following variables: the more "liberal scientists" involved in the study, the less scientificly credible the results.

The whole thread (10 posts)

The only way to verify electronic voting shows they may have stolen Florida (too). - Bowser - 11/22/2004 9:09:37 PM
- Denial and rage are just stages of mourning. - ebnelson - 11/23/2004 5:18:55 AM
  - they're also the begining stages of impeachment - E.P. Grondine - 11/23/2004 6:33:21 AM
- Some comments by Kevin Drum - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2004 9:55:33 PM
- re: Apparently their regression analysis was poorly designed. - Scott Evil - 11/22/2004 9:46:59 PM
  - Count the votes - E.P. Grondine - 11/23/2004 6:36:27 AM
    - re: Count the votes - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 4:22:09 PM
      - re: Count the votes - E.P. Grondine - 11/23/2004 4:54:24 PM
        
        re: Count the votes - Tom Brosz - 11/23/2004 5:03:50 PM
        
        re: Broward and Palm Beach were statisticly outliers in 2000 as well. - Scott Evil - 11/23/2004 5:10:37 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)