re: "no longer interested in discussion"

Current Events » in reply to "no longer interested in discussion"

ebnelson — 12/3/2004 7:59:20 PM (archived)

Discussion with someone at least informed of history, demonstrating integrity. Don opted out, unfortunately.
My brief answers are not shutting down discussion at all.
They are to the point and responsive to what is offered.
Ed

The whole thread (19 posts)

1,262 - Donald - 12/3/2004 2:15:19 PM
- Lie on, Herr Goebells - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 4:08:44 PM
  - 1,264 - Donald - 12/3/2004 9:10:19 PM
    - The reasons were far beyond WMDs, and you know it but continue to claim otherwise. - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 9:31:04 PM
  - Godwin's Law - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2004 4:34:58 PM
    - Don't pick on Ed...... - Publius - 12/5/2004 3:48:26 PM
    - re: Godwin's Law - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 4:46:01 PM
      - "no longer interested in discussion" - Tony - 12/3/2004 5:47:11 PM
        
        re: "no longer interested in discussion" - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 7:59:20 PM
        
        That is one of the funniest posts I've read. (n/t) - Bowser - 12/3/2004 10:42:52 PM
        
        Maybe you never read your own stuff? (n/t) - ebnelson - 12/4/2004 6:09:54 AM
        
        The "Oh, yeah!! You're worse!!" is kinda juvenile, eb. Went out with grade school. To understand it in an adult, - - - - Bowser - 12/4/2004 7:11:39 AM
        
        It is clear you are enjoying yourself. - ebnelson - 12/4/2004 4:33:37 PM
      - unresponded would be good - FrankC - 12/3/2004 5:24:56 PM
        
        Medicine. - RobVG - 12/6/2004 1:08:01 AM
      - Ed is right - Gary - 12/3/2004 4:58:55 PM
        
        Right. All factual data not favorable to administration policy should be banned.,,,,, (n/t) - Publius - 12/5/2004 3:50:38 PM
        
        No, spamming the HZ should be grounds for banning. (n/t) - Gary - 12/5/2004 7:57:31 PM
        
        Take it to Community. - Mary Anne - 12/6/2004 1:18:13 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (19 posts)