Current Events » in reply to re: Godwin's Law

The whole thread (19 posts)

• 1,262 - Donald - 12/3/2004 2:15:19 PM
  • Lie on, Herr Goebells - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 4:08:44 PM
    • 1,264 - Donald - 12/3/2004 9:10:19 PM
      • The reasons were far beyond WMDs, and you know it but continue to claim otherwise. - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 9:31:04 PM
    • Godwin's Law - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2004 4:34:58 PM
      • Don't pick on Ed...... - Publius - 12/5/2004 3:48:26 PM
      • re: Godwin's Law - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 4:46:01 PM
        • "no longer interested in discussion" - Tony - 12/3/2004 5:47:11 PM
          • re: "no longer interested in discussion" - ebnelson - 12/3/2004 7:59:20 PM
            • That is one of the funniest posts I've read. (n/t) - Bowser - 12/3/2004 10:42:52 PM
              • Maybe you never read your own stuff? (n/t) - ebnelson - 12/4/2004 6:09:54 AM
                • The "Oh, yeah!! You're worse!!" is kinda juvenile, eb. Went out with grade school. To understand it in an adult, - - - - Bowser - 12/4/2004 7:11:39 AM
                  • It is clear you are enjoying yourself. - ebnelson - 12/4/2004 4:33:37 PM
        • unresponded would be good - FrankC - 12/3/2004 5:24:56 PM
          • Medicine. - RobVG - 12/6/2004 1:08:01 AM
        • Ed is right - Gary - 12/3/2004 4:58:55 PM
          • Right. All factual data not favorable to administration policy should be banned.,,,,, (n/t) - Publius - 12/5/2004 3:50:38 PM
            • No, spamming the HZ should be grounds for banning. (n/t) - Gary - 12/5/2004 7:57:31 PM
              • Take it to Community. - Mary Anne - 12/6/2004 1:18:13 AM