You have to admit that the CIA's accuracy and analysis record has been mixed for the past several years. This has included taking information from overseas sources which turned out to have agendas of their own. Much of our assumptions about WMD rested on testimony from Iraqi defectors, some of which proved later to be false.

In addition, it's painfully obvious that there are people in the CIA who have had a definite anti-Administration agenda, reflected in a number of leaked reports, actual BOOKS written, and other things.

I might have overstated it in my last reply. I'm just saying that this new information should be taken with a grain of salt.