here
You felt that Jan 27th was better than Feb or even March?
strange.
You're right about one thing. The internet makes rewriting history harder.
It doesn't however stop one from ignoring facts and opinions that don't jibe with one's own view.
Remember back in the day, we had arguments about Inspections, Iraq the size of California ad inf.?
Recall that Davin or I said something along the lines of "Well if we know where they are, why dont we tell the inspectors?"
Much squirming around "UN is corrupt", "UN cant be trusted", "Blix is a terror sympathiser", "We cant harm our sources*".
Recall how we were appeasers because we didn't agree, because we thought the UN was finding nothing because there was nothing? Oh how we were laughed at. Ha bloody ha.
Recall how we couldn't take the word of a madman over that of our Prez? Oh what fun.
Problem is, we were right, and you and the rest of "the right" were 99.999% wrong.
A fact that I don't think most of the right has yet come to terms with.
Now which group is indulging in revisionist history again??
e.g. revisit RL's thread below.
*Old news flash. Turns out we didnt have any frigging sources.
Current Events » in reply to Getting a bit old.
Better UNMOVIC site and some going over old ground for old times sake
The whole thread (19 posts)
- CIA Correcting Prewar Iraq WMD Assessments With Retrospective Reports
