re: Historical STATUS?

Space/Science » in reply to re: Historical STATUS?

Delbert — 2/9/2005 2:04:49 AM (archived)

Agreed, why expend any more resources to deorbit it when it seems they will probably have enough control to prevent it from coming close to any populated areas.

The whole thread (14 posts)

HUBBLE TRUBBLE :( - carl - 2/7/2005 7:05:13 PM
- Historical STATUS? - carl - 2/8/2005 8:25:56 PM
  - re: Shuttle flights have already brought back parts of it (n/t) - Raoul - 2/9/2005 6:41:38 AM
  - re: Historical STATUS? - Larry J - 2/8/2005 10:45:44 PM
    - re: Historical STATUS? - Delbert - 2/9/2005 2:04:49 AM
      - One potential problem... - Larry J - 2/9/2005 2:43:00 PM
        
        re: One potential problem... - Delbert - 2/9/2005 3:41:58 PM
        
        re: One potential problem... - Larry J - 2/9/2005 4:37:47 PM
- How much would it cost to keep the Hubble in service? - Larry J - 2/7/2005 7:13:06 PM
  - re: How much would it cost to keep the Hubble in service? - Doug Ellison - 2/8/2005 12:51:40 AM
  - re: Worth it? - Raoul - 2/7/2005 7:44:03 PM
  - Not give up projects, mothball/rehab special ones - carl - 2/7/2005 7:35:50 PM
    - re: Not give up projects, mothball/rehab special ones - Doug Ellison - 2/8/2005 10:21:10 AM
    - The Hubble has been in space for almost 15 years - Larry J - 2/7/2005 8:59:22 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)