Fine.

Current Events » in reply to Multiple missiles

Fine.

David F Mayer — 2/15/2005 11:30:41 PM (archived)

Whatever its design specifications call for, it should be tested at that level. If it is two missile system, then test it against two missiles.

But, if it is supposed to stop a volley of 50, we must test it against a volley of fifty. Then we will know exactly how good or bad it is. And so will out potential attackers.

The whole thread (14 posts)

Missile shield test fizzles out - Bowser - 2/14/2005 8:29:55 PM
- More evidence that the anti-missile shield is useless. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 12:12:57 AM
  - Tell ya what... - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2005 12:50:10 AM
    - The results will be exactly the same, only cheaper. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 3:20:08 AM
      - Slow down. - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2005 4:37:11 AM
        
        I am. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 5:11:53 PM
        
        Testing - Tony - 2/15/2005 5:55:50 PM
        
        Ah, but it did NOT fail in use. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 6:32:15 PM
        
        Multiple missiles - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2005 6:50:43 PM
        
        Fine. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 11:30:41 PM
    - The same thing that would happen with the missile "shield". - Bowser - 2/15/2005 1:21:01 AM
      - NOTHING! That's what. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 3:23:55 AM
        
        If we used your standard for military testing... - Larry J - 2/15/2005 5:24:36 PM
        
        A discipline that has proven unreliable. - David F Mayer - 2/15/2005 6:36:43 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (14 posts)