re: "Then you criticize someone who has been maligned on this "Flame board" when they respond. "

Flame » in reply to "Then you criticize someone who has been maligned on this "Flame board" when they respond. "

Keith Cowing — 2/27/2005 1:45:30 AM (archived)

R.L. The point is that you both responded so ineptly and childishly and in the end did yourselves great harm...

"Great harm"? I have been responding to idiots like Chris online for ten years.... get a grip.

The whole thread (12 posts)

THIS JUST IN!!!! - ReaLly finding this hilarious - 2/27/2005 12:36:40 AM
- lol! (n/t) - alcaray - 2/28/2005 4:01:29 PM
- Alas, the entertainment has now faded. - Keith Cowing - 2/27/2005 12:48:05 AM
  - "Then you criticize someone who has been maligned on this "Flame board" when they respond. " - R.L. - 2/27/2005 1:02:59 AM
    - re: "Then you criticize someone who has been maligned on this "Flame board" when they respond. " - Keith Cowing - 2/27/2005 1:45:30 AM
      - BTW: i AM NOT TAKING SIDES- I think you are both morons incapable of a decent flame... - R.L. - 2/27/2005 2:05:50 AM
        
        What is this a grab at attention? - Chris Vancil - 2/28/2005 9:50:18 AM
      - " have been responding to idiots like Chris online for ten years.... get a grip. " - R.L. - 2/27/2005 1:56:37 AM
        
        No, no, R.L. The official term for such ping-pong posts is "boogerhead," not "poopoo head." (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/27/2005 3:06:32 AM
        
        They are both Poo-Poo headed boogers- that was the point of my erudite post (n/t) - R.L - 2/27/2005 3:19:30 AM
        
        re: " have been responding to idiots like Chris online for ten years.... get a grip. " - Keith Cowing - 2/27/2005 2:02:54 AM
        
        "So why does everyone (including you) continue to respond?" - R.L.\ - 2/27/2005 2:08:41 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (12 posts)