Tom - when the Prez declares a national policy, and then violates that policy - - -
When neocons derided other for negotiating with terrorists, pointed out all the disastrous consequences, and then Bush sets out to violate that policy,
you think it's just a matter of opposing Bush to point out the discrepancy.
Is that how all neocons will justify the switch, another switch? By saying that since Bush is saying and doing it cannot be in error?
Arf
