Thanks for the reply.

According to you I made some errors but then so did you. Makes us even I suppose in that regard.

You said:

"And WRT Mathematics and what you call, in scare quotes, a 'model'- you are confused. Mathematics is how the model of a phenomenon is explained. You don't have the terminology correct, IMO."

OK so the model that I have is explained with the formula. I understand now. Please don't change your mind and say something else if I start explaining the model with the formula.

By the way you are confusing my model with that of the atomic vortex model, they are NOT the same.
The model that I have developed (with the help from some interesting source) does make predictions, does have mathematics to explain it with, and sounds very logical to me, but has not been published in any journal yet.
I figured that if I get some type of reaction from people on these boards it would help me to correct my terminology and give some insight into the type of minds that will most likely be in the audience that will read, criticize, absorb, and learn or discard and not understand the information.

Hey this is the FLAME board, so I should say something nasty, but I'm too tired right now.
Good night.

Johannes