Ever hear of it?

It's when, rather than merely claiming that your model is "supported by mathematics....[and] can be subjected to formal logical analysis", you actually subject it to the analysis of established experts in the field.

SDAI, at least, has put his theory* before the curious public, at some length, on his own website. If it's been analyzed by anyone other than the sorely-missed Crank.com, I have no knowledge... nevertheless, it's out there for perusal.

Where's yours?

As much as I admire the raw talent of most of the minds inhabiting the Zone, if this is what you consider "peer review", you're sorely mistaken. But, if I recall correctly, you're the guy who thinks the atmosphere is heated by radioactivity... so "sorely mistaken" may well be a way of life.

[* -- Not exacty putting Descartes before the horse, but close.]