Space/Science » in reply to The Oreskes paper results. Re: human induced climate change?

Related paper.

et — 5/5/2005 5:24:36 PM (archived)

A three year old article on the interaction, both present and predicted, of all this atmospheric CO2 that has been and will be emitted.

Plot that on whatever scale you like, the concentration and it's rate of change is increasing above any natural value ever recorded.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (17 posts)

• The Oreskes paper results. Re: human induced climate change? - et - 5/5/2005 4:59:02 PM
  • Here are the 34 abstracts that allegedly contradict the consensus - pwokenyaw - 5/5/2005 8:00:41 PM
    • re: allegedly contradict the consensus - Tom Brosz - 5/6/2005 3:16:14 AM
      • re: allegedly contradict the consensus - pwokenyaw - 5/6/2005 4:52:45 PM
    • Consensus not demostratable - gbaikie - 5/6/2005 2:55:49 AM
      • I understand that's your conclusion but do you care to react to the evidence? - pwokenyaw - 5/6/2005 4:37:10 PM
    • My conclusion after reading all 33 - pwokenyaw - 5/5/2005 8:38:26 PM
  • I only wish I was getting paid for this. - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 5:39:06 PM
    • Another article on this - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 5:59:02 PM
      • The hockey stick issue has been addressed. - et - 5/5/2005 6:30:40 PM
        • BTW... - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 7:05:49 PM
        • This link is very useful - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 6:48:43 PM
          • They're the same damn data, presented and plotted differently. - et - 5/5/2005 7:03:09 PM
            • re: "presented and plotted differently" - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 7:32:23 PM
      • Clarification - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 6:00:48 PM
  • Related paper. - et - 5/5/2005 5:24:36 PM
    • Another question: - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2005 6:18:49 PM