If you're implying I've misrepresented the GOP platform, I disagree. This excerpt calls for a "Human Life Amendment" to the Constitution, the text of which that was discussed in platform committee meetings and other forums would prohibit abortion in ALL circumstances (i.e., no incest or "life of mother at risk" exceptions). It does call for appointing judges who "respect innocent human life", which in the context of a section on abortion would imply that what they mean are judges who oppose abortion.

What have I misrepresented here?

And, do you disagree that a pro-choice candidate would *not* get the GOP nomination, which was the point I was making?