re: "employers of donors" an apology

Current Events » in reply to "employers of donors"

phil — 5/18/2005 9:31:52 PM (archived)

I did not intend to be as snippy as I came across. My only (inadequate) excuse is that I'm often pressed for time and multi-tasking when I respond, and my replies are far more curt than even my real world wise-ass persona. You were absolutely spot on in excersizing skepticism about sources, which are subject to sampling error.

The whole thread (7 posts)

Diversity Watch - p - 5/18/2005 2:49:42 PM
- How were contributions traced back to teachers? - alcaray - 5/18/2005 3:09:11 PM
  - re: How were contributions traced back to teachers? - p - 5/18/2005 3:35:25 PM
    - re: How were contributions traced back to teachers? Methodology - p - 5/18/2005 4:13:43 PM
      - "employers of donors" - alcaray - 5/18/2005 5:55:52 PM
        
        re: "employers of donors" an apology - phil - 5/18/2005 9:31:52 PM
        
        Careful, we are edging dangerously close to a group hug (n/t) - alcaray - 5/18/2005 10:36:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (7 posts)