Okay, I'm really confused, now.
You locate a link from the link I posted. On that link is another link to someone that Neal Boortz identifies as a lunatic. And this lunatic, identified as such, is supposed to somehow represent a beam in my eye?
I also agree that this is a lunatic. How does this factor in any way into my discussion on bin Laden?
Is it your thesis that we should be trying to "understand" this nut? Or that this nut somehow represents any of the conservatives on that website? You know, the ones who label him a "freak nutcase?"
What am I missing here?