Let me get this straight...

Current Events » in reply to Kyoto update

alcaray — 6/30/2005 5:51:46 PM (archived)

...Samuelson is using statistics comparing 1990 to 2002 to evaluate Kyoto's effect? Is the rest of the piece filled with the same crap, so can I safely (and wisely) stop reading at the second paragraph?

The whole thread (13 posts)

Kyoto update - Tom Brosz - 6/30/2005 4:35:08 AM
- France, Italy, Germany and Britain constitute a large majority of EU's economy - pwokenyaw - 7/1/2005 4:12:43 PM
- Let me get this straight... - alcaray - 6/30/2005 5:51:46 PM
  - Kyoto was signed in 1997 - Tom Brosz - 6/30/2005 9:33:16 PM
    - I don't get it - alcaray - 6/30/2005 10:17:56 PM
      - re: I don't get it - Tom Brosz - 6/30/2005 10:42:02 PM
        
        the gist of my argument is that Kyoto is not in effect yet, so you can't measure its result (n/t) - alcaray - 6/30/2005 10:58:43 PM
        
        Then what the heck was the New Zealand article about? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/30/2005 11:00:33 PM
        
        Mainly about how predictions were out of whack - Tony - 7/1/2005 4:13:15 PM
        
        Well, they should have had a better "plan" going in. ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 7/1/2005 6:56:49 PM
        
        didn't get that far. Waiting to see if the whole thing was a waste of time. - alcaray - 6/30/2005 11:09:47 PM
        
        Obviously, at least half of this conversation is. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/30/2005 11:52:19 PM
- re: Kyoto update - gbaikie - 6/30/2005 5:35:16 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)