When you say, <"nothing in the world I can possibly say to argue with you."> That being the case you used a lots of words to say it.
"Reasons" or excuses aside, the issue is the same in Israel and New London: In the words of Justice O'Connor, " all private property is vunerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner.......given to an owner who will use it in a way the legislature (Kineset in this case) deems more benficial to the public in the process."
These are precisely the issues; not the bombs to be addressed, and there are cogent arguments and positions on both sides. But then, this sort of discussion is only relevant to those that care about living under a system of laws.
Publius
Current Events » in reply to Emotion has nothing to do with your bad analogy
since you won't address the issues, you are right
The whole thread (34 posts)
- The events unfolding in Gaza
- A word about those "illegal settlements" is in order
- re: A word about those "illegal settlements" is in order
- You're comparing apples and fishes
- addressing that matter of perspective........
- Emotion has nothing to do with your bad analogy
- since you won't address the issues, you are right
- Emotion has nothing to do with your bad analogy
- addressing that matter of perspective........
- Gaza
- The problem is that it is in nobodys self-defined interests for the palestinian state to succeed
- I am in total agreement with you.
- A word about those "illegal settlements" is in order
