re: Up and down not really an issue at those speeds

Space/Science » in reply to Up and down not really an issue at those speeds

Jacob Samorodin — 8/16/2005 11:28:38 PM (archived)

Backwards and..downwards.
If the ET is [more-or-less] "beneath" the shuttle as its ascending, doesn't it stand to reason that the pieces falling of
will not only fall back, but down...missing the shuttle?

The whole thread (6 posts)

What's wrong with this solution for the space shuttle's 'foam drop-off problem'? - Jacob Samorodin - 8/16/2005 11:09:53 PM
- Up and down not really an issue at those speeds - Tom Brosz - 8/16/2005 11:15:55 PM
  - re: Up and down not really an issue at those speeds - Jacob Samorodin - 8/16/2005 11:28:38 PM
    - re: Up and down not really an issue at those speeds - Doug Ellison - 8/16/2005 11:38:00 PM
    - Do a quick calculation - Tom Brosz - 8/16/2005 11:37:02 PM
      - Looks like you're right. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 8/17/2005 1:17:34 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (6 posts)