Off Topic » in reply to Tom is right

re:Le cosmoschtroumpf

Raoul — 10/16/2005 5:56:36 PM (archived)

And if it's too much, le Cosmoschtroumpf will take you with him!

C'est schtroumpfant, non? ;))

Raoul

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (30 posts)

• Your UNICEF pennies at work... - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2005 6:09:53 PM
  • Video here - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2005 7:30:52 PM
    • I thought that that was a great Smuff film. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 10/11/2005 9:21:15 PM
      • Go smurf yourself, scott... - Papa smurf - 10/11/2005 9:42:16 PM
        • You smut mouthed little smaggot. - Murph the Smurf - 10/11/2005 10:45:56 PM
  • They had it coming (n/t) - alcaray - 10/10/2005 10:49:01 PM
    • Actually, I agree with you there... - R.L. - 10/11/2005 6:02:54 AM
      • Actually I thought one of the most suffocatingly awful programs ever was... - LJK - 10/11/2005 2:02:37 PM
        • re: They were a community of Smaggots. - Scott Evil (Warning Post may offend) - 10/11/2005 9:15:28 PM
          • There was only one chick. - Sam F. - 10/11/2005 11:51:58 PM
            • She was created by Gargamel. - Lee - 10/15/2005 2:34:00 AM
              • So you're saying..... - Sam F. - 10/15/2005 9:02:10 AM
                • Why do you thing he was always trying to turn the smurfs into gold? - Lee - 10/15/2005 11:56:23 PM
                  • Correction: Why do you think.... (n/t) - Lee - 10/15/2005 11:57:33 PM
  • And this upsets you...why? (n/t) - R.L. - 10/10/2005 9:31:58 PM
    • The politics are a bit obvious. - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2005 2:21:07 AM
      • Tom is right - Real PoliticaL - 10/11/2005 11:46:47 AM
        • re:Le cosmoschtroumpf - Raoul - 10/16/2005 5:56:36 PM
        • smurf-tastic. - jms - 10/15/2005 4:40:53 PM
        • That's classic! - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2005 2:49:22 PM
          • re: That's classic! - R.L. - 10/13/2005 5:55:46 PM
            • They watch blue movies to compensate (n/t) - Sam F. - 10/14/2005 2:37:23 AM
          • re: That's classic! - :) - 10/11/2005 3:08:44 PM
        • very good RL (n/t) - SDG - 10/11/2005 2:41:42 PM
      • It was to raise money to rehabilitate child soldiers in Burundi... - R.L. - 10/11/2005 10:11:48 AM
        • re: child soldiers in Burundi - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2005 2:57:21 PM
          • I see... - ? - 10/11/2005 3:17:25 PM
            • It would have had more shock value - Sam F. - 10/11/2005 11:47:23 PM
            • re: I see... - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2005 7:34:31 PM
      • Bombing a civilian population is terrorism in uniform. - Bowser - 10/11/2005 2:47:26 AM