and I understand that everyone wants to make more money, even the 16 year old kids that hold 90% of the jobs in question.
So yeah, the kids have a right to a "living" wage, as do the various shift supervisors, assistant managers, and managers who make 30K and up at McDonald. How does this affect their future wage increases and benefits?
What happens to those 16 year old kids? Their still crappy but higher paying jobs will probably be filled by older more competent workers who will still have a shitty job with little future. Do the kids then remain unemployed and what is the end result of that?
I give you the moral high ground based on your honorable intentions and ideals, I am only trying to point out the practicality involved in a complicated economic problem in a capitalistic system.
In the end does this eliminate more misery than it creates, or is it seen as just another brick in the wall?
Flame » in reply to I do not understand this.
I don't think they are greedy...
The whole thread (27 posts)
- I do not understand this.
- I don't think they are greedy...
- Just google "median age of fast food workers"
- "16 year old kids that hold 90% of the jobs in question"
- The power of one.
- One word: class struggle.
- I don't think they are greedy...
