No need to interview "eyewitnesses".

Off Topic » in reply to re: On the basis of your assertion, am I to believe that you personally have evaluated all the 234 + persons

David F Mayer — 11/17/2005 2:48:09 PM (archived)

Eyewitness testimony is totally worthless and not admissible into the Court of Science. So far, there has been not a trace of real evidence that UFOs are anything other than the usual mix of aircraft, balloons, planets, stars, meteors, ..... When somebody comes up with some unambiguous physical cairns from UFOs, I will believe that they are something other than the usual objects that we see in the skies.

The whole thread (10 posts)

NSA Affidavit on UFO secrecy from 1980 - LJK - 11/14/2005 5:56:53 PM
- re: Whatever they are, they seem to be real. (n/t) - Johannes - 11/15/2005 4:36:22 AM
  - Yes, UFOs are genuine delusions. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/16/2005 9:39:37 PM
    - re: On the basis of your assertion, am I to believe that you personally have evaluated all the 234 + persons - Johannes - 11/17/2005 12:51:04 AM
      - No need to interview "eyewitnesses". - David F Mayer - 11/17/2005 2:48:09 PM
        
        re: No need to interview "eyewitnesses". - LJK - 11/17/2005 3:03:08 PM
        
        I don't claim that they are lying, just that people are not good observers, - David F Mayer - 11/17/2005 3:07:50 PM
        
        re: I don't claim that they are lying, just that people are not good observers, - LJK - 11/17/2005 5:00:42 PM
        
        Space.com article on 1980 NSA files - LJK - 11/17/2005 6:10:26 PM
        
        "If the government has nothing to hide then why is it keeping so many UFO records under lock and key? - Lindy - 11/18/2005 6:17:12 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (10 posts)